UK Green Party Defines Zionism as Racism in Controversial Motion

The Green Party of England and Wales has passed a motion defining Zionism as racism, with 56% of delegates voting in favor at its annual conference in Brighton. The resolution frames Zionism as an ideology that seeks to establish an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine, “to the exclusion and/or domination of the non-Jewish population.” This definition has sparked significant debate within the party and among its members.

The motion, proposed by members of the Greens for Palestine group, calls for the establishment of a single Palestinian state with “equal rights for all,” including Jews. However, it does not provide for the continued existence of Israel alongside such a state under a two-state solution. This omission has raised concerns about the potential implications for the Israeli government and its citizens.

Previously, the Green Party’s official policy had allowed for either a one-state or two-state solution, depending on a democratic process. The recent motion, which received the highest vote in a member poll, is expected to become official party policy. This shift represents a significant departure from the party’s earlier stance and has drawn criticism from some of its senior figures.

Green Party leader Zack Polanski did not vote on the motion but supported amendments aimed at qualifying the call for a single Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital and providing protections for Jewish members affiliated with Zionist organizations. Both amendments were rejected, highlighting the internal divisions within the party.

Senior party figures have expressed mixed reactions to the motion. Co-deputy leader Rachel Millward stated she would vote against it, while fellow co-deputy leader Mothin Ali indicated support. The party’s leader in the British Parliament, Dr. Ellie Chowns, also urged members to consider the broader implications of the resolution.

The motion has drawn attention for its potential to influence international discourse on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Critics argue that defining Zionism as racism could set a dangerous precedent, potentially impacting diplomatic relations and the perception of Jewish identity globally. The resolution underscores the complex and often contentious nature of political debates surrounding the Middle East.

In light of the motion’s approval, the Green Party’s stance reflects a growing emphasis on Palestinian rights within its platform. This shift aligns with broader global conversations about justice, equality, and the pursuit of peace. As the party moves forward, its new policy will likely shape its approach to international issues and its engagement with both Jewish and Palestinian communities.

Source: Read the original report