RI Senate Approves Bill to Revive Expired Clergy Abuse Lawsuits

The Rhode Island Senate has approved legislation that would allow survivors of clergy sexual abuse to refile lawsuits against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence and other institutions. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Mark McKenney, creates a two-year “revival window” for claims that were previously time-barred. The measure passed 37-0, marking a significant step in addressing decades of abuse and cover-ups.

The legislation follows the release of a 282-page report by Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha, which detailed widespread abuse by clergy and institutional complicity. McKenney emphasized the gravity of the report, stating that the conduct of some authorities, particularly within the church, has been “appalling.” He highlighted the prioritization of institutional reputation over the protection of children in their care.

Survivors, such as Dr. Ann Hagan Webb, who was abused by a priest from 1957 to 1965, have welcomed the bill. Webb expressed hope that the legislation would provide a path to justice for others who previously had no avenue for legal recourse. “It opens the door for sure,” she said, acknowledging the challenges ahead but recognizing the importance of the opportunity.

The bill now moves to the House, where a slightly different version, sponsored by Rep. Carol Hagan McEntee, cleared the chamber on April 7. McEntee has expressed agreement with the Senate’s revisions. Previous attempts to pass similar legislation faced resistance, particularly from the Senate, until recent amendments addressed constitutional concerns.

Before the recent changes, legislators considered a resolution asking the Rhode Island Supreme Court to review the matter. However, strong opposition from Neronha and former U.S. District Court Judge William E. Smith led to revisions in McKenney’s bill. The amendments aim to strengthen the legislation against potential legal challenges.

The revival of these lawsuits reflects a broader effort to hold institutions accountable for past abuses. While the bill does not imply guilt, it underscores the commitment to pursuing justice for survivors and ensuring that institutions are held responsible for their actions. The process highlights the importance of accountability and the pursuit of truth in the face of historical wrongdoing.

Source: Read the original report