Jehovah’s Witness Refuses Mobilization Citing Religious Beliefs, Receives Three-Year Sentence for Evasion

In Khmelnitsky region, a Jehovah’s Witness faced legal consequences after refusing to participate in mobilization, citing his religious beliefs. The individual, who was on a military record and had passed the military service examination in September 2025, was declared fit for service. Despite being informed of the consequences of refusal and the possibility of performing non-combat tasks, he declined to receive a summons and did not appear for military service.

The case was brought before a court, where it was emphasized that during the current military situation, the legal framework does not allow for the replacement of military service with alternative service for those called up for mobilization. The relevant legislation applies only to fixed-term service, not to mobilization. The court ruled that religious beliefs do not exempt an individual from responsibility for evading mobilization.

The individual’s refusal was documented through written evidence, video footage from body cameras, and witness accounts confirming his religious beliefs. The court also noted that after recruitment, a member of the armed forces may perform tasks other than the use of weapons, provided this does not conflict with their faith. However, this option is not available to those who refuse mobilization.

The court found the accused guilty under Article 336 of the Criminal Code, which addresses evasion of military service during mobilization. The sentence imposed was the minimum penalty prescribed by the law, reflecting the severity of the offense. The ruling underscores the legal obligation to participate in mobilization, regardless of personal beliefs.

The case highlights the tension between individual religious convictions and national service obligations. It also illustrates the legal system’s approach to balancing personal freedoms with collective responsibilities during times of conflict. The outcome serves as a precedent for similar cases, reinforcing the principle that religious beliefs do not absolve individuals of legal duties during mobilization.

Source: Read the original report (translated from Russian)