San Mateo County Implements Ordinance to Criminalize Refusal of Shelter Beds Amid Homelessness Challenges

San Mateo County has taken a bold step in its efforts to address homelessness, implementing an ordinance that allows officials to cite and arrest individuals who repeatedly refuse shelter beds. This measure, which took effect in late February, is part of a broader strategy to reduce unsheltered homelessness and improve public safety. However, the law’s scope is limited, applying only to the approximately 114 unsheltered individuals living in unincorporated areas of the county.

County Executive Mike Callagy explained that most homeless individuals in these areas reside in motorhomes and RVs along the coast. As the ordinance does not cover vehicle dwellers, enforcement has been minimal. Callagy noted that most people have been willing to accept services, suggesting the law may not be as impactful as intended. The county is exploring additional options to address those in vehicles who refuse shelter, but no concrete plans have been announced yet.

The shelter ordinance was enacted before recent state and federal actions aimed at reducing encampments. Governor Gavin Newsom’s executive order last month directed state agencies to shut down encampments, and a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June allowed cities and counties to clear encampments without first offering shelter. These developments have intensified pressure on local governments to find solutions.

Despite these challenges, officials remain optimistic about the potential of their new approaches. Callagy believes the ordinance could serve as a model for other local governments, particularly cities on the Peninsula. East Palo Alto Mayor Antonio Lopez, who is running for a county supervisor seat, has publicly supported similar measures, calling for coordinated action across the county.

The county’s mental health court, known as the CARE Court, has also been launched as part of its strategy. This program aims to compel more unhoused residents into treatment. However, only three individuals have met the program’s qualifications in the two months since its inception, raising questions about its effectiveness. Officials acknowledge the early results are underwhelming but remain committed to the initiative.

As the county continues to grapple with its estimated 2,130 homeless residents, the effectiveness of these new policies remains uncertain. While some officials believe these measures can make a difference, critics argue that they may not address the root causes of homelessness. The challenge lies in balancing public safety, compassion, and the need for sustainable solutions.

Source: Read the original report