Tulsi Gabbard’s alleged political guidance from Chris Butler of the Science of Identity Foundation reported in Washington Post article.

Tulsi Gabbard, the former Congresswoman and national intelligence director, has been the subject of allegations that she followed political directives from Chris Butler, the leader of the Science of Identity Foundation. These claims emerged from a June 21, 2026, report by The Washington Post, which detailed thousands of alleged memos from Butler directing Gabbard on her public statements and legislative actions. The memos, according to the report, showed a striking alignment between Butler’s messages and Gabbard’s political output.

The Science of Identity Foundation is an offshoot of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, a Hindu organization. Gabbard was raised within this religious community, and Butler, who leads SIF, has been described as a spiritual guide to her. The Washington Post article provided some of the alleged memos for review, highlighting the apparent influence Butler may have had on Gabbard’s political decisions.

Snopes, which is investigating the claims, has not been able to independently verify the report’s assertions. The organization has sought comments from Gabbard, the Science of Identity Foundation, and the Washington Post reporter, Jon Swaine, to confirm or refute the allegations. As of now, no definitive evidence has been presented to support or deny the claims.

Social media users who shared the allegations suggested that Butler played a significant role in shaping Gabbard’s policies and public appearances. The claims have sparked debate about the extent of influence religious leaders may have on political figures, particularly when their personal and professional lives intersect.

The report raises questions about the boundaries between personal faith and public service. It underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in political leadership, especially when individuals are influenced by external figures, whether religious or otherwise. The situation also highlights the need for clear institutional safeguards to ensure that personal beliefs do not compromise public duties.

The allegations have not been proven, but they serve as a reminder of the potential for conflict between spiritual guidance and political responsibility. As the investigation continues, the focus remains on verifying the facts and ensuring that any claims are substantiated with credible evidence. The case illustrates the complexities of navigating faith, governance, and public trust in a democratic society.

Source: Read the original report