Abilene Christian University to Review Sexuality Policy Following Concerns Over Holy Sexuality Week Event (Abilene, Texas)

Abilene Christian University, affiliated with the Churches of Christ, is reviewing its sexuality policy following feedback from over 2,000 students, alumni, and friends of the university regarding Holy Sexuality Week. The event, which focused on relationships and sexuality, sparked concerns among some attendees about the messaging presented.

Wildcats for Inclusion, an alumni group formed in response to the event, published a letter criticizing the university for providing a platform to individuals who denied the lived reality of LGBTQ+ Christians. The letter accused participants of making inaccurate claims about the genetic basis of homosexuality and delivering a “ludicrous and hateful” statement that “the opposite of homosexuality is holiness.”

In an email to the group, university President Phil Schubert stated that the board of trustees plans to review the school’s Sexual Stewardship Policy in January. However, Schubert noted that while he cannot speak for the board, he does not anticipate changes to the policy, citing the extensive research, prayer, and development that went into its creation in 2017.

The policy emphasizes “chastity outside of marriage between a man and a woman” and calls for an inclusive environment for all students, provided they refrain from sexual activity outside of marriage between a man and a woman. Schubert acknowledged concerns about one-sided messaging but emphasized the university’s commitment to its faith-based mission.

From November 6-9, the university hosted several speakers addressing topics related to sex and sexuality. Schubert noted that 90% of the speaking events were not focused on same-sex relationships. One of the most controversial speakers was Christopher Yuan, a former gay man who now identifies as celibate. Yuan emphasized God’s unconditional love but argued that love does not equate to unconditional approval of behavior. He stated, “The opposite of homosexuality is holiness.”

The university’s approach reflects a broader tension within the Restoration movement, where institutions balance theological convictions with the need to foster inclusivity and dialogue. As the review process unfolds, the community continues to grapple with the challenge of reconciling faith-based principles with the diverse experiences of its students and alumni.

Source: Read the original report