Episcopal Leadership Remains Silent as Former Priest’s Historic Child Molestation Case Ends in Hung Jury

The trial of Father Richard Losch, a former Episcopal priest and Boy Scout leader from Marblehead, Massachusetts, concluded in a mistrial after a jury deadlocked on charges of sexually assaulting a 12-year-old boy in 1976. The case, which has resurfaced after nearly five decades, highlights the complexities of prosecuting historical allegations of abuse within religious institutions.

Losch, who served at St. Michael’s Episcopal Church in Marblehead from 1969 to 1986, was also employed at the Tower School and held leadership roles in the Boy Scouts. The prosecution alleged that Losch raped the victim, a boy who later recounted the incident under a pseudonym. The trial, which took place in 2026, saw the jury deliberate for approximately eight hours before failing to reach a verdict.

The defense attorney, in his closing remarks, raised questions about the credibility of the victim’s testimony, suggesting that the delay in reporting the alleged assault may have been influenced by financial motives. He argued that the victim, referred to as Jack, only came forward after learning about potential compensation for abuse survivors. The attorney also implied that the victim may have sought attention and recognition within the priest abuse community.

The defense’s portrayal of the victim’s memory as unreliable drew criticism. The attorney contrasted the victim’s recollection with his own vivid memories of traumatic events, such as the 9/11 attacks and the loss of his daughter to illness. He claimed that victims of childhood abuse typically retain detailed memories of their experiences, which he argued undermined the credibility of the victim’s account in this case.

The Episcopal Church, which continues to recognize Losch as a priest in good standing, has not publicly commented on the case. This silence has raised questions about the church’s approach to historical abuse allegations and its accountability mechanisms. The case underscores the ongoing challenges faced by religious institutions in addressing past misconduct while balancing the rights of individuals and the pursuit of justice.

The trial has reignited discussions about the long-term consequences of childhood abuse and the role of memory in legal proceedings. As CS Lewis once wrote, “We have a strange illusion that mere time cancels sin. But mere time does nothing either to the fact or to the guilt of a sin.” The case serves as a reminder of the enduring impact of such crimes and the moral imperative to seek truth and justice, even after many years have passed.

Source: Read the original report