Exclusive Brethren Lodge Complaint Over Parliamentary Attacks With Human Rights Commission

Members of the Exclusive Brethren have lodged a complaint with the Human Rights Commission regarding alleged breaches of civil liberties by the Labour Government. The commission confirmed the complaint had been filed but stated it could not comment further until an investigation was completed. Auckland businessman Andrew Simmons, one of seven men involved in the Brethren’s election campaign last year, confirmed the complaint was being pursued. He noted the group’s concerns centered on the conduct of the matter and planned to issue a statement outlining their position next week.

The Brethren’s involvement in the election campaign resurfaced during parliamentary debates, where Labour MPs attempted to deflect criticism of their party’s election spending. The group’s members regularly attend parliamentary proceedings, often bringing their children to watch sessions on Wednesday nights. Parliament’s Serjeant-at-Arms confirmed this practice has been ongoing for several years. Cabinet minister Trevor Mallard referred to the Brethren as “chinless scarf-wearers” during a debate, a remark that upset some members. Tim Lough, a Wellington member, expressed concern that the comment was derogatory.

Helen Clark, a former Labour leader, addressed the issue by stating that the only known avoidance of election law involved the National Party’s failure to account for $1.2 million spent by the Brethren on anti-Labour and anti-Green Party pamphlets. Last year, the Chief Electoral Officer, David Henry, referred complaints about the Brethren’s campaign materials to the police. He noted that one pamphlet appeared to promote the party vote for National, which would require authorization. However, since National did not consent to the spending, it was not classified as election spending. The police ultimately decided not to take action.

Former Act MP Stephen Franks, a legal professional, suggested that the Brethren were being unfairly targeted, a situation he described as ironic given that the same politicians had recently criticized National MP Bob Clarkson for his remarks about Muslim women wearing burqas. The Brethren’s legal action reflects their belief that their civil rights have been compromised, a stance that aligns with their commitment to upholding moral and legal standards in public life.

The Brethren’s engagement in political matters, including their election campaign, highlights their active role in shaping public discourse. Their actions have sparked debate about the intersection of religious groups and political processes. As the Human Rights Commission investigates the complaint, the case underscores the importance of respecting civil liberties while maintaining transparency and accountability in public affairs. Micah 6:8 reminds us to act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with God, principles that should guide all interactions within society.

Source: Read the original report