Israeli Diplomatic Support for Ethiopia’s Red Sea Access Sparks Tensions With Egypt

Israeli diplomatic support for Ethiopia’s bid to gain access to the Red Sea has intensified tensions with Egypt, which has consistently opposed Ethiopia’s efforts. The dispute adds another layer to an already complex relationship between the two nations, particularly given their separate disagreement over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and its impact on Egypt’s water rights.

Ethiopia, a landlocked nation since 1993 following Eritrea’s independence, relies on neighboring countries for maritime access. The Ethiopian News Agency reported that Israel has publicly backed Ethiopia’s push for a Red Sea outlet, citing statements from Israeli Ambassador to Ethiopia Avraham Neguise. Neguise emphasized that Israel’s support aligns with broader interests in strengthening Ethiopia and stabilizing the Red Sea region.

Neguise’s remarks reflect a pattern of Israeli engagement in Ethiopia’s regional ambitions. In August, he stated that Israel would continue to support Ethiopia’s development as a leading economic power in Africa. This stance has drawn criticism from some experts, who argue that Israel’s involvement could undermine Egypt’s national interests.

African affairs expert Asmaa al-Husseini noted that Israel’s statements “increase tensions with Egypt” and suggest a “covert Israeli role” in Ethiopia’s Red Sea initiatives. She warned that Egypt would closely monitor the situation and respond based on the level of escalation and Ethiopia’s actions. “Egypt has the right to defend its national security,” she said, adding that any perceived threat to its interests would prompt a measured response.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty reiterated his country’s position during a news conference, stating that no nation should grant another country military maritime access. He emphasized that such actions would create chaos, especially for landlocked African states. Abdelatty’s comments underscore Egypt’s firm stance on sovereignty and regional stability.

Experts like Ramadan Qarny have highlighted the broader implications of the dispute, noting that Egypt’s opposition is rooted in established principles of international law and regional security. The situation highlights the delicate balance of power in the Red Sea region, where competing interests and historical grievances continue to shape diplomatic relations.

Source: Read the original report