LDS Church Files Trademark Lawsuit Against John Dehlin and Mormon Stories

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has initiated a lawsuit against John Dehlin and his podcast “Mormon Stories,” alleging trademark infringement. The church is requesting that Dehlin either remove or alter the term “Mormon” from his brand. This legal action has raised questions about the timing of the dispute, as Dehlin has been active in podcasting for over two decades.

According to a press release, the church’s attorneys first began the legal process in November 2025. The letter writer speculates that significant events in October 2025 may have influenced this decision. Among these events was the ascension of Dallin Oaks to the presidency of the church. Oaks, a former Utah Supreme Court justice with a background in commercial litigation, brings a unique legal perspective to the role.

Oaks has spent much of his career in the courtroom, where he dealt with trademark disputes. His appointment marks a shift in leadership for the church, bringing an experienced litigator to the helm. This change may have prompted the church to pursue legal avenues to address perceived challenges to its brand and teachings.

The letter writer notes that Oaks’ first official policy change was lowering the missionary age for women to 18. This decision, along with the ongoing legal action, suggests a strategic approach to managing the church’s public image and intellectual property. The timing of these moves has led to speculation about the motivations behind the lawsuit.

The letter raises concerns about the use of legal means to address ideological differences. Oaks has long advocated for religious freedom and the protection of free speech through the law. His decision to pursue legal action against a critic appears to contradict his previous stance, prompting questions about the church’s approach to dissent and free expression.

The letter writer calls for the LDS Church to consider alternative methods of resolving disputes, such as allowing courts to address legal questions rather than ideological ones. This approach would align with the principles of justice and fairness, ensuring that the law serves its intended purpose without being weaponized for political ends.

Source: Read the original report