Ontario Christian school argues it couldn’t foresee emotional harm from abuse claims in appeal

Grenville Christian College, a now-defunct Ontario Christian school, is at the center of a legal dispute regarding its past practices. The school, which operated in Brockville, Ontario, from 1973 until its closure in 2007, was associated with the Community of Jesus, a controversial Christian group based in the United States. In 2020, a judge ruled that the school’s staff systematically abused students during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, including verbal and emotional harm.

The current appeal, heard in the Ontario Court of Appeal, argues that the school and the estates of two former headmasters should not be held accountable for the abuse. The lawyers representing these parties claim their clients had no way of knowing the abuse would cause long-term emotional damage. The trial court had previously found the school responsible for creating an abusive, authoritarian environment that exploited and controlled students.

Testimony from former students revealed a culture of public shaming, where students were subjected to screaming and name-calling for minor infractions. Some accounts describe physical abuse, including beatings with a paddle that caused bleeding. Students were also told their parents were “evil” and endured exorcism-like rituals. Girls were criticized for being “prostitutes” and too tempting for men, while boys suspected of being gay were called “faggots” and warned they would be “damned to hell.”

The judge’s ruling emphasized that the school’s actions were intentional and harmful, creating an environment where students were vulnerable to manipulation and abuse. The legal battle continues as the court weighs whether the school and its former leaders can be held responsible for the lasting impact of their actions.

The case raises important questions about accountability and the long-term consequences of past actions. It underscores the need for transparency and care in institutions that serve minors, especially those with religious affiliations. As the appeal proceeds, the focus remains on the well-being of those affected and the pursuit of justice.

Source: Read the original report