
A UK Appeals Tribunal has ruled that it is coherent to describe Zionism as a racist ideology, stating it “promotes the establishment of a state for only one race of people” and could also be termed “colonial and imperialistic.” This judgment from the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) upheld an earlier employment tribunal’s ruling that the University of Bristol unlawfully discriminated against Professor David Miller by dismissing him over his anti-Zionist beliefs.
The court’s reasoning held that Miller’s ideology, which advocates for a Jewish state in a territory historically inhabited by Palestinians, qualifies as “racist” under the Equality Act 2010. It further argued that such an ideology, involving the migration of one group with imperial support to displace an indigenous population, is “colonial and imperialistic.” The university had challenged the 2024 tribunal’s decision, but the EAT ultimately rejected Bristol’s appeal.
Miller, a professor of political sociology who joined the University of Bristol in 2018, was dismissed for gross misconduct in October 2021 following comments he made earlier that year expressing his anti-Zionist views. His research had focused on lobbying groups, including those associated with Israel and other nations.
The 2024 employment tribunal found that Miller’s dismissal and subsequent rejection of his internal appeal constituted unlawful direct discrimination because his anti-Zionist beliefs were dismissed. Miller views this ruling as a significant victory for the anti-Zionist movement, suggesting the attempt to silence him has backfired.
This decision highlights the ongoing policy debates and public discussions surrounding anti-Zionism and its perceived connection to racism. The tribunal’s finding underscores the legal protections afforded to philosophical beliefs, even those deemed controversial, within the UK’s framework for addressing discrimination.
Source: Read the original report