
Episcopal Church Laments Supreme Court Rulings Backing Trump Administration on Immigration
The Episcopal Church expressed sorrow over recent Supreme Court decisions that aligned with the Trump administration’s immigration policies. On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the administration in two cases, both decided 6-3. The first case, *Mullin v. Al Otro Lado*, upheld the administration’s policy of restricting asylum-seekers’ entry into the country. The second case allowed the termination of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians.
The Episcopal Church’s Washington, D.C.-based Office of Government Relations issued a statement condemning these rulings. The statement acknowledged the uncertainty of their full impact, noting that outcomes will depend on how the administration implements the policies, how agencies exercise discretion, and whether further legal challenges or congressional action follow.
Presiding Bishop Sean Rowe and House of Deputies President Julia Ayala Harris were among ecumenical and interfaith leaders who signed a legal brief supporting the lawsuit related to asylum-seekers. The brief was filed by Al Otro Lado, a California-based organization advocating for refugees and migrants. The class-action lawsuit aimed to end the Department of Homeland Security’s practice of turning away asylum-seekers at the border based on criteria critics argue do not align with U.S. immigration law.
The Episcopal Church has consistently supported Temporary Protected Status, a program allowing the executive branch to protect foreign nationals from deportation if they face harm upon returning to their home countries. The church’s stance reflects a commitment to safeguarding individuals fleeing persecution and ensuring they have access to legal protections.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in *Mullin v. Al Otro Lado* has raised concerns about the rights of asylum-seekers. The decision holds that individuals stopped before physically crossing into U.S. territory have not “arrived” in the United States for the purpose of claiming asylum. This could prevent vulnerable people from seeking protection, undermining the nation’s commitment to offering refuge to those fleeing persecution.
The Episcopal Church has emphasized the moral imperative of upholding the rights of asylum-seekers. In an amicus brief signed by Presiding Bishop Sean W. Rowe and House of Deputies President Julia Ayala Harris, the church argued against the government’s position that asylum seekers can be barred from lawfully crossing the U.S. border at a port of entry without an opportunity to seek asylum.
The church’s response underscores its dedication to justice and mercy, reflecting a belief in the importance of protecting the vulnerable. As Proverbs 18:17 reminds us, “The first to present his case seems right, until another comes forward and questions him.” The Episcopal Church continues to advocate for policies that uphold the dignity and rights of all people, especially those in need of asylum and protection.
Source: Read the original report