
Woman Charged with Threatening Federal Agents in Case Against Accused Ministry Leader David E. Taylor
U.S. District Judge Susan K. DeClercq ruled on Nov. 9 that neither the First Amendment nor the Religious Freedom Restoration Act barred the prosecution of David E. Taylor, according to The Roys Report. Taylor had asked the court to dismiss forced labor charges against him.
Taylor and co-leader Michelle Brannon were arrested in August 2025, after the FBI raided ministry properties in Michigan, Florida, Texas and North Carolina. Taylor faces eight counts of forced labor. He and Brannon both face forced labor and money laundering conspiracy charges. These are charges, and the government’s allegations have not been proven in court.
Prosecutors allege that the ministry raised about $50 million over more than a decade and used some of that money to buy homes and luxury vehicles for Taylor. Prosecutors also allege that workers who fell short of fundraising goals faced food restrictions and sleep deprivation. Protecting people who depend on a leader’s authority from coercion is central to the case, as the charges are framed (Proverbs 31:8-9).
The filings also include allegations that Taylor used threats to obtain explicit photos and videos, and that he threatened to distribute them if workers defied him. The judge denied a motion to remove these sexually explicit communication allegations from the indictment. The judge also upheld an Aug. 25 ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concerning Taylor’s pretrial detention.
A separate report from MinistryWatch, published in an episode whose headline focuses on other matters, states that the FBI has charged a woman with threatening federal agents involved in the prosecution of Taylor and his Kingdom of God Global Church. The source does not give the date of that charge or the woman’s name, and it does not describe the circumstances of the alleged threats.
MinistryWatch describes the broader case as involving legal complexities and potential misconduct claims arising in religious institutions.
Sources (2):