Why “Jesus” Is Enough: Scripture, Names, and Knowing the Savior

The post takes up a recent social media trend in which some Christians insist on particular ways of naming Jesus. The author says that comments criticizing the plain use of “Jesus” arrive regularly, and that using only his name is perfectly fine. He points out that the New Testament writers, including the author of Hebrews, often referred to Jesus by name alone, and he adds that Jesus does not become upset when his titles go unspoken.

The author then turns to the current push to use forms such as Yeshua, Yehoshua, and Yahusha, along with alternatives like YHWH. He grants that there are historical reasons some of these forms may have been used among Jewish speakers, but he argues there are no spiritual benefits in adopting them. Adopting “correct” Hebrew pronunciation will not make a person more spiritual, and a “sacred name” will not speed prayers along. He also warns against the idea, sometimes linked to these names, that believers must return to the law-keeping of Judaism, which he describes as a message that undermines grace.

He explains that the New Testament was written in Greek, where the apostles used Iēsous, and that this name passed through Latin and the King James Bible before becoming “Jesus” in modern English. He notes that “Jesus” appears nearly 1,000 times in the New Testament, while the other forms are never used there.

The post concludes that people who prefer Yeshua in their own language are free to use it, but that focusing on names misses the point. The author writes that the power lies in knowing the person of Jesus Christ, and that this knowledge is at the heart of the simple gospel he preaches.

Source: Read the original report